Confirming an anti-scratch coating requires more than reading the UV400 marking on a pair of designer sunglasses. UV400 describes ultraviolet protection, while scratch resistance depends on the lens surface treatment, coating consistency, and performance during abrasion. For the listed sunglasses, the available product information confirms UV400 but does not verify that an anti-scratch coating has been applied.
The safest approval process combines supplier documentation, production-sample inspection, and a repeatable comparison test. Until these steps generate product-specific and consistent evidence, the anti-scratch claim should be treated as unconfirmed.
The listed item is a logo-custom 2026 retro gradient-lens metal pilot sun glass with a double bridge and polygon-style design for men and women. Its product name identifies UV400 protection, but the parameter section does not provide details about a lens coating.

There is no product-specific statement confirming the coating material, application process, coating thickness, abrasion method, test load, number of cycles, or acceptance limit. The supplier describes R&D testing for lens UV protection, impact resistance, frame comfort, and wear durability, but those company-level capabilities do not automatically prove anti-scratch performance for this particular model.
Begin by asking the supplier for records that directly identify the sunglasses model and production batch. Useful documents include the product specification, lens-coating description, quality-inspection report, and abrasion-test report. The evidence should explain whether the anti-scratch feature comes from a hard coating, a surface treatment, the lens material itself, or a combination of technologies.
A reliable test record should also identify the tested sample, testing date, abrasion equipment, applied load, contact material, stroke or cycle count, evaluation method, and pass criteria. Generic statements about durable lenses are less useful than results linked to the same model and production process intended for the order.
Before approving a bulk shipment, examine a sample taken from the intended production run. Inspect both lenses under uniform lighting and compare them with an approved reference sample or an untreated control when one is available. Look for uneven surface coverage, streaks, peeling, cloudiness, pinholes, edge lifting, discoloration, and other visible defects.
Clean the lens carefully before inspection so that dust, oil, or removable residue is not mistaken for coating damage. Record the sample condition with photographs and note whether any mark disappears after cleaning or remains as a permanent optical change. Visual inspection can reveal poor application quality, but it cannot establish how the lens will perform after repeated abrasion.
For a practical comparison, test samples from the same production batch using identical conditions. If possible, include an approved reference lens and an untreated comparison lens. Apply the same contact material, pressure, motion, number of passes, and cleaning procedure to each sample. Examine the lenses before and after testing under the same lighting and viewing angle.
Record haze, visible lines, coating loss, changes in transparency, and any effect on the gradient appearance. The comparison can show whether one sample performs differently from another, but it should not be presented as a certified scratch-resistance rating unless the method follows a recognized standard and includes a defined threshold. The supplied product data does not provide such a formal limit.
| Verification area | What the available record shows | Recommended follow-up |
|---|---|---|
| UV protection | UV400 is stated in the product name. | Request model-specific UV test evidence if certification is required. |
| Anti-scratch coating | No explicit anti-scratch coating claim appears in the supplied product information. | Obtain a coating description and test record linked to the product. |
| Wear durability | The company describes wear-durability testing as part of its R&D capability. | Confirm whether the stated testing covers this exact sunglasses model. |
| Coating parameters | Material, thickness, application process, abrasion method, and pass level are not provided. | Ask the supplier to complete the technical specification. |
| Production quality | No sample inspection result is included in the available data. | Review samples for coverage, peeling, clouding, and surface marks. |
| Scratch performance | No numerical scratch-resistance result is listed. | Arrange a controlled comparison using samples from the same batch. |
No. UV400 indicates the stated level of ultraviolet protection. It does not confirm that a hard coating or other anti-scratch treatment has been applied, and it does not provide an abrasion result.
Request the product specification, coating-material description, quality-inspection record, and abrasion-test report. The report should identify the sample, method, test conditions, evaluation criteria, and result. If the documents are generic or do not identify the model, request model-specific confirmation.
No. Visual inspection is useful for finding uneven coverage, peeling, haze, and obvious surface defects, but it cannot predict long-term abrasion performance. A controlled test is needed for a more dependable comparison.
Use a documented internal comparison and label the outcome accurately as comparative evidence rather than a certified rating. Keep the samples, test conditions, photographs, and observations so the result can be repeated during production inspection.
The available information supports the identification of UV400 protection and describes broader company testing related to lens protection, impact resistance, comfort, and wear durability. However, it does not verify an anti-scratch coating for the listed designer sunglasses. Approve the coating claim only after reviewing product-specific supplier records, inspecting a production sample, and obtaining consistent results from a controlled abrasion comparison.
Yiwu Green Shine Arts presents its eyewear business as an ecosystem with global reach and an integrated supply-chain model. For technical clarification or product support, contact the company at leoxiao@cngreenshine.com.
Yiwu Green Shine Arts & Crafts Co., Ltd. was established in 2016 in Yiwu, Zhejiang Province, and specializes in fashion eyewear, including sunglasses, optical frames, acetate sunglasses, children’s sunglasses, and reading glasses. The company states that its R&D capability covers 3D modeling, rapid prototyping, structural optimization, mold customization, and testing related to UV protection, impact resistance, comfort, and wear durability. Its listed main products include anti-blue-light glasses, sunglasses, reading glasses, and chromic anti-blue-light glasses.

REPORT